- Site Feedback
- IDEA Sites
- Digital Freedoms
- 2012 Presidential Debates Guide
- Asia Youth Forum
- Big Apple Cogers
- Debate Changing Europe
- Debate in the Neighborhood
- Debating and Producing Media
- Debating the Future of Youth in Africa and Europe
- Dialogue without borders
- Digital Debating Blog
- Free Speech Debate
- Global Youth Forum
- Global Debate and Public Policy Challenge
- International Public Policy Forum
- Online Mentoring
- The Freedom Series
- Youth and Sports Mega-Events
Debate of the Masses
Working with whatever size group you have, divide the group into two halves: affirmative and negative. Then divide each of those groups into two halves: the first affirmatives and the second affirmatives, etc.
Pick a topic with which the students are already familiar, or one on which they can easily generate ideas.
You start by having half of the affirmative speakers get up in turn and present one single argument (no more than 30 seconds each). Everyone is instructed to write down and number each point, so if there are ten affirmative speakers in the first point, they should have numbered arguments one through ten in the first column of their notes.
Before the affirmatives start, let the first negatives know that they will be responsible for refuting one of the affirmative arguments (have the speakers numbered in a sequence so that if a person is negative #7, then they know they refute the 7th affirmative argument. Once the first group of affirmative speakers have finished, have the first group of negative speakers answer each of the affirmative points.
Following this, the second group of affirmative speakers are up. Their goal is to defend one of the original affirmative arguments by attacking the negative response to that argument. Again, each person has a number, so affirmative #3 would be expected to defend the 3rd affirmative argument by attacking what the negative says against that argument.
Finally, the second group of negative completes the process in the same manner. If you like, you can add judges who present a decision.
For instructors, the goal is to have an informal free-flowing exchange and to keep things moving so that everyone speaks. Even if the arguments arent very good, students will get the idea of structure and given the numbers you should hear at least a couple of good arguments and good answers.