- Calendar
- Map
- Site Feedback
- IDEA Sites
- Languages
- Projects
- Digital Freedoms
- 2012 Presidential Debates Guide
- Asia Youth Forum
- Big Apple Cogers
- Debate@Europe
- Debate Changing Europe
- Debate in the Neighborhood
- Debating and Producing Media
- Debating the Future of Youth in Africa and Europe
- Digital Debating Blog
- Free Speech Debate
- Global Youth Forum
- Global Debate and Public Policy Challenge
- International Public Policy Forum
- Online Mentoring
- The Freedom Series
- Youth and Sports Mega-Events
Trading unessential products overseas is nothing but harmfull and wastefull
Trading unessential products overseas is nothing but harmfull and wastefull
Trading unessential products overseas is nothing but harmfull and wastefull. trading overseas costs loads of money. wastefull. it causes loads of pollution which is bad for the enviroment. Your whole life your taught by the Government to respect your surroundings but they are doing the opposite!!!
51 weeks 6 hours ago
I am indeed thining "what the hell"! We need trade and products from overseas. No country has all the necessary resources to prosper independently. Countries like the UK dont produce enough food or raw materials, dont manufacture things like clothes (though they undeniably could as textiles used to be big business in the UK). Those countries that do have the necessary raw materials: Brazil definately has enough minerals and crops to survive but it does not have the skills to be making some high tech products (though they do produce some such as aircraft) and to be inventing new ones like necessary new medicines. We all benefit from the trade of goods and services around the world. It has been the undisputed driving force behind progress for over a thousand years.
Edit: I guess food would count as essential so the UK would not starve!
50 weeks 6 days ago
- Login or register to post comments
- Login to reply
You may be thinking "what the hell? we need products that we cant make or grow or whatever here!" but we CAN survive without them so theres really no point what so ever!!! basically i belive in doing so you are just wasting money killing animals with increase of global warming. the cave people surrvived without these products. and we wouldnt be here today withour them so yeah!!! bananas
51 weeks 6 hours ago
- Login or register to post comments
- Login to reply
I am unconvinced by the premise here. Trading overseas clearly does not cost more money or it wouldnt be done at all! Its clearly more efficient for some places to specialise - see Adam Smith.
An im also not convinced entirely on polution either. The vast majority (90%) of trade is by sea which is not greatly polluting relative to the bulk carried and is better than almost any other method you care to name.
http://www.marisec.org/shippingfacts/keyfacts/
By all means ban air freight! We could go back to sailing ships if we have to but old sailing ships topped out at 2,000 tons so it would take fifty or sixty to make one modern bulk carrier and would requre more than a hundred times as many crew!
(I admit that sailing ships should be able to be built bigger now!)
50 weeks 6 days ago
- Login or register to post comments
- Login to reply
since you mention it cargo ships are beginning to once again be fitted with sails, though the sails look more like gigantic kites than sails of old. Though of course the ships wont be entirely sail powered but they might eventually manage a combination of sail and renewable energy.
50 weeks 6 days ago
- Login or register to post comments
- Login to reply
It exports pollution from the rich world to the poor world. Rich countries claim they have cleaned themselves up but what they have really done is increase trade so allowing them to give the polluting manufacturing to developing countries.
If developed countries had to maintain their own manufacturing they would make sure it is clean!
50 weeks 6 days ago
- Login or register to post comments
- Login to reply
That doesnt cure trade, it just moves it; when Lancashire produced clothes the cotton came from the USA or India, the clothes were then exported.
I guess what im saying is the argument over wheather we need quite so much as we make is a different one from arguing we shouldnt trade.
The Developed world might produce in a greener way but green regulation would probably just push ruthless buissness to move away; so only very tough tarriffs could keep industry both home and green.
.... and that would also bring the aid or trade argument about the developing world... if we ruthlessly reindustrialised through high tarriff barriers and subsidies we would then be blamed for pushing the developing world down.
50 weeks 6 days ago
- Login or register to post comments
- Login to reply


You may be thinking "what the hell? we need products that we cant make or grow or whatever here!" but we CAN survive without them so theres really no point what so ever!!! basically i belive in doing so you are just wasting money killing animals with increase of global warming. the cave people surrvived without these products. and we wouldnt be here today withour them so yeah!!! bananas