Discussion

Does Russia need strong leadership?

3 replies [Last post]

Does Russia need strong leadership?

Alex Helling's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 778
Applause: 49

Russia has been having another day of protest against Vladimir Putin with tens of thousands out on the streets of Moscow demonstrating. Opposition leader Yevgenia Chirikova listed the opposition demands as

  1. “The resignation of Vladimir Putin
  2. The development of a new elections law in parliament
  3. The passing of that law by the current parliament
  4. The election of a new parliament
  5. The new parliament examining and significantly limiting the presidential term of office
  6. The new parliament choosing a new presidential elections law and appointing a date of a new presidential election and gubernatorial elections
  7. A new parliament”

Clearly if the opposition got their way there would be a large shift in how Russia is run. Or would there? Putin would like us to believe that Russia needs strong leadership, his leadership. The country certainly has a history of very strong leaders from the Tsars like Ivan the Terrible to Peter the Great and Communist dictators Lenin and Stalin. Russia has been most successful (or perhaps has simply seemed most successful) when it has had strong leaders and chaotic when leaders lose control. If the opposition managed to gain control would Russia become more like western democracies or would another strong man simply take power? 

Debatabase debate: http://idebate.org/debatabase/debates/constitutional-governance/house-believes-russia-needs-strong-leadership

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/live-blog-march-of-millions-opposition-protest/460203.html

49 weeks 3 days ago
KateDebate's picture
Offline
Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Posts: 148
Applause: 12

Russia is such a vast country that I think it would be much better run if run in a decentralised way. The distances involved mean that government needs to be at a much more local level than for example in a small country like the UK and so Russia should really not have such a strong centralised leadership. I am hopeful that the democracy activists will eventually force Putin out and bring about radical change in Russia.

49 weeks 2 days ago
booji's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 371
Applause: 26

I am rather less optimistic that the russian democracy activists will get anywhere than you are. If they were going to have a quick victory it would have come before the elections in the form of Putin not cheating so much and allowing a run off election. That he did not would seem to show that he intends to stay as a strong leader and will probablly eventually grow intolerant of a small section of Russian society constantly protesting. Unfortunately Putin may well be right when he points out that the majority wanted him to stay. If he does grow intolerant then he may resort to a classic strong man clampdown.

Despite saying that I doint think there is any good reason why Russia should always have strong leaders. We can poin t to an impressive list of strong rulers in the past but it should be remembered that democracy is an advanced form of government, most countries when they turn to democracy will have behind them a long succession of strong rulers, either monarchs or dictators.

49 weeks 2 days ago
Alastair Stevens's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Mar 2012
Posts: 118
Applause: 11

I think the whole assumption behind this topic is wrong. Does Russia have 'strong leadership' now? Yes Putin may be an autocrat but in modern government how powerful is an autocrat really? He can get what he wants done when he is focused on it but Putin cannot control everything. In areas where he is not in direct control the system falls down as Russia is corrupt meaning that policies are unlikely ever to be fully implemented. This is shown by the number of anti corruption drives there have been through Putin and Medvedev's time in office and how little success they have had.

49 weeks 1 day ago
Syndicate content